PDA

View Full Version : Glorious



Metla
08-01-2005, 10:47 PM
http://news.com.com/Gates+taking+a+seat+in+your+den/2008-1041_3-5514121.html?tag=nefd.lede

MartynC
08-01-2005, 11:12 PM
http://news.com.com/Gates+taking+a+seat+in+your+den/2008-1041_3-5514121.html?tag=nefd.lede

Isn't this the same as the other one? http://pressf1.pcworld.co.nz/showthread.php?t=53108 :2cents:

Metla
08-01-2005, 11:18 PM
Indeed,but this time its glorious rather then sickening.

agent
08-01-2005, 11:18 PM
Note the key difference in the thread title though.

Methinks Metla is being cunning... or perhaps he's trying to present a balanced argument, just like Kim Hill.

:p

beetle
08-01-2005, 11:28 PM
Well in my thinking doesnt matter either way, if you love em, or hate em, there is no getting away from em.
they aint gonna disappeer in any hurry for nobody.

and yeah admit i use their products, doesnt mean i like it, or them, just a fact of life. but am unable to help myself out of that hole for quite a while.

Comes down to, Money talks, and lack of competition.......... will take a long time for any body to make a dent in their financial status, gains in the world.

and also hindsight....these other companies are probably kicking themselves for not seeing the future direction that computers and software took, and the financial rewards it has made a lot of people happy....(one in particular...LOL)

Just my uninformed and biased 2cents worth.....:p

b :lol:

MartynC
08-01-2005, 11:30 PM
Indeed,but this time its glorious rather then sickening.
true...true...if you are a M$ disciple then it is good news :D

MartynC
08-01-2005, 11:31 PM
Note the key difference in the thread title though.

Methinks Metla is being cunning... or perhaps he's trying to present a balanced argument, just like Kim Hill.

:p

Kim Hill = balanced :confused: me better stop here before me get banned maybe :xmouth:

Metla
08-01-2005, 11:36 PM
The point being that the thread title is irrilivent and shouldn't have any impact on the conclusions people come to from reading the iterview or there views on MS.

The content hasn't changed,No ones feet have been trampled on by someone holding their own views.

E|im
09-01-2005, 12:00 AM
lmao

bsssst
09-01-2005, 09:20 AM
The point being that the thread title is irrilivent and shouldn't have any impact on the conclusions people come to from reading the iterview or there views on MS.

The content hasn't changed,No ones feet have been trampled on by someone holding their own views.

Metla,

All the comments I made previously still stand for this thread, What brings such benovelence to Micro$oft Victims from you, allmost at the Witching Hour??

You should Know buy now you can post a title and a link here standing alone, and still be the Devil incarnate, If the Micro$oft Victims dont like what it says, truth or not in the article.

The article still indicates MicroSofts intention to dominate media dispersion, at a huge cost to the consumer, if it can.

Have you seen this

http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=20585

Micro$oft is not perhaps to have the field to its self after all. Interesting lease concept on consumables.