PDA

View Full Version : New Norton Actually Good?



icow
06-01-2011, 08:51 PM
I have heard that Norton 2011 is actually good and is a great improvement on the old version. Is this true?

Then again you don't have to do much to improve Norton. Or have people from symantec been injecting their users with morphine to make them think it's good?

Snorkbox
06-01-2011, 09:05 PM
Personally I can't be bothered with Norton any more.

I use MSE. And if I was going to pay then Nod32.

pcuser42
06-01-2011, 09:14 PM
Only one person can answer this :D

*whistles for wainuitech*

:pf1mobmini:

Snorkbox
06-01-2011, 09:17 PM
I think he may agree with me.

The Error Guy
06-01-2011, 10:00 PM
I use the 360 version 360 V4. seems ok, can't complain I guess. seems to do that MSSE doesnt. so far neither have missed or found anything different

nedkelly
06-01-2011, 10:16 PM
Go Nod32

wainuitech
06-01-2011, 10:31 PM
Only one person can answer this :D

*whistles for wainuitech*

:pf1mobmini: Woof Woof


Watch it, I'll pee on your leg :lol:

Snorkbox ---------- :thumbs:

I will say its better than what it was. But still a PITA :D

Speedy Gonzales
07-01-2011, 06:04 AM
Too late for it to be any good. If it wasnt so bloated, (and useless before) then people would probably use it now

pctek
07-01-2011, 06:57 AM
I have heard that Norton 2011 is actually good

Heard where? Some Mag review?
Bloat may be one thing but it's biggest failing was that it never found bugger all. Doubt that's changed.

GameJunkie
07-01-2011, 08:15 AM
havent used nortons(stop swearing :yuck:) for about 3 and a half years.

had nod32 running every since

Agent_24
07-01-2011, 09:40 AM
I believe the performance impact on your system is a lot less than it used to be with Norton.

However I don't think it's the best for actual detection rates.

CYaBro
07-01-2011, 12:02 PM
It does seem to run better than the old versions, still not as fast as NOD32, BUT it still misses too many viruses / trojans.